*Performance evaluation of telecommunications networks

           

I have been interested in phenomena related to correlation in telecommunications networks. The first problem is that of the correlation between the loss process of consecutive packets. Assume that N consecutive packets are considered to constitute one message. Then the loss probability of a message cannot simply be calculated through the loss probabilities of individual packets, since these losses are not independent. We propose several models to we calculate these probabilities explicitly. This is a starting point for the analysis of the effect of adding redundant packets to messages, which allows to reconstruct losses. Other problems in which we need to compute the loss probabilities of messages arise in message discarding policies (early discard, partial or selective discard). Another type of problem we study is the delay of a message that contains N packets. This again cannot be calculated from the delay of single packets, and require an analysis based on multi-dimensional (PGF).

Papers on the analysis of losses and on forward error corrections:

*[1.1] E. Altman and A. Jean-Marie, The loss process of messages in an M/M/1/K queue , IEEE INFOCOM'94 , Toronto, Canada, pp. 1191-1198, June, 1994. Full version:
Loss probabilities for messages with redundant packets feeding a finite buffer , IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications , Vol 16, No. 5, pp. 779-787, 1998.
*[1.2] O. Ait-Hellal, E. Altman and A. Jean-Marie, Calculating Loss Probabilities in an M/M/1 Queue with Redundent Retransmissions , 33rd Annual Allerton Conference On Communication, Control, and Computing , Illinois, September 1995.
*[1.3] O. Ait-Hellal, E. Altman, A. Jean-Marie and I. A. Kurkova, " On loss probabilities in presence of redundant packets and several traffic sources ", Performance Evaluation , pp. 486-518, Vol. 36-37, 1999.
*[1.4] E. Altman, C. Barakat and V. M. Ramos Ramos, " Queueing analysis of simple FEC schemes for IP Telephony ", Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Anchorage, April, 2001 . The full paper is available in INRIA Research Report No. RR-3998 , September, 2000. ( Slides ).
*[1.5] E. Altman, C. Barakat and V. M. Ramos Ramos , On the utility of FEC mechanisms for audio applications postscript , pdf , QofIS'2001, Second International Workshop on Quality of future Internet Services, Coimbra, Portugal, 24-26 Sept. 2001. (Slides) .
*[1.6] E. Altman, C. Barakat and V. M. Ramos Ramos , Queuing analysis of simple FEC schemes for Voice over IP postscript , pdf , Communications Networks, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 185-206, June, 2002.
*[1.7] P. Dube Eitan Altman, "Utility Analysis of Simple FEC Schemes for Voice over IP," to  appear in the proc. of  IFIP Networking 2002, May 19-24 2002, Pisa, Italy.
*[1.8] P. Dube, Omar Ait-Hellal, Eitan Altman, "On Loss Probabilities in Presence of Redundant Packets with Random Drop," Performance Evaluation, Volume 53, Issues 3-4, 2003, pages 147-167. For a shorter version see Proc. of  IFIP Networking 2002, May 19-24 2002, Pisa, Italy; received BEST STUDENT PAPER AWARD.
*[1.9] A. Jean-Marie, P. Dube D. Artiges and E. Altman, " Decreasing Loss Probabilities by Redundancy and Interleaving: A Queueing Analysis ", Proceeding of ITC 18 , Berlin, Sept 2003

Analysis of policies for discard arrivals into queues:

*[2.1] P. Dube and E. Altman, "On Fluid Analysis of Queues with Selective Message Discarding Policies", Proceedings of the 38th Annual Allerton Conference, Allerton House, Oct 4-6, Allerton House, Monticelio, Illinois, USA.
*[2.2] P. Dube and E. Altman, Queueing and Fluid Analysis of Partial Message Discard Policy, Proceedings of 9th IFIP Working Conference on Performance Modelling and Evaluation of ATM and IP Networks, June 27-29, 2001, Budapest, Hungary.
*[2.3] P. Dube and E. Altman, " On the Workload Process in a Fluid Queue with Bursty Input and Selective Discarding ", Proceedings of the 17th International Teletraffic Congress, Salvador da Bahia, Brazil, September 24-28, 2001.
*[2.4] P. Dube and E. Altman, " Queueing Analysis of Early Message Discarding Policy ", IEEE ICC , New York City, USA, April 2002.
*[2.5] P. Dube and E. Altman, " Fluid Analysis of Early Message Discard Policy Under Heavy Traffic ", IEEE INFOCOM'02 , New York City, USA, June 2002.
*[2.6] P. Dube and E. Altman, " Godput analysis of a fluid queue with selective discarding and a responsive bursty source ", IEEE INFOCOM'03 , San Francisco, USA, 2003.
*[2.7] P. Dube and E. Altman, " Queueing and Fluid Analysis of Partial Message Discarding Policy ", QUESTA , Vol. 44 Number 3, pp 253-280, 2003.
*[2.8] P. Dube and E. Altman, " On the workload process in a fluid queue with bursty input and selevticve discarding ", Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences (PEIS) , Vol 17, 527-543, Oct 2003.

Other papers on performance evaluaion:

*[3.1] E. Altman and A. Jean-Marie, The distribution of delays of dispersed messages in an M/M/1 queue , IEEE INFOCOM'95 , Boston, USA, April, 1995.
*[3.2] E. Altman, D. Artiges, K. Traore, On the Integration of Best-Effort and Guaranteed Performance Services, European Transactions on Telecommunications , Special Issue on Architectures, Protocols and Quality of Service for the Internet of the Future, Issue No. 2, February-March 1999. See also INRIA Research Report No. 3222 , July 1997.
*[3.3] E. Altman, A. Orda and N. Shimkin , Bandwidth allocation for Guaranteed versus Best Effort service categories , IEEE Infocom , San-Fransisco, California, USA, 1998. Full version in: QUESTA , Vol. 36, pp. 89-105, 2000.
*[3.4] E. Altman, Z. Liu and R. Righter , Scheduling of an input-queued switch to achieve maximal throughput , Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 14, pp. 327-334, 2000.
*[3.5] G. Alpan, E. Altman, H. Magroun, and D. Kofman , Call Admission Control in the presence of Point-to-Multipoint Best Effort Connections , IEEE ICC'99 , Vancouver, Canada, June, 1999.
*[3.6] E. Altman and H. J. Kushner , Admission Control for Combined Guaranteed Performance and Best Effort Communications Systems Under Heavy Traffic , IEEE ICC'99 , SIAM J. Control and Optimization, pp. 1780-1807, vol 37 no 6, 1999.
*[3.7] E. Altman, G. Koole and T. Jimenez , On the comparison of queueing systems with their fluid limits, Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Vol. 15, PP. 165-178, 2001.
*[3.8] E. Altman, Stochastic recursive equations with applications to queues with dependent vacations , Annals of Operations Research, 112(1): 43-61; Apr, 2002.
*[3.9] S. Alouf, E. Altman, P. Nain, "Optimal on-line estimation of the size of a dynamic multicast group". IEEE Infocom 2002, New York City, New York, volume 2, pages 1109-1118, June 2002.
*[3.10] E. Altman and T. Jimenez , Simulation Analysis of RED with Short Lived TCP Connections , Computer Networks, Vol. 44 Issue 5, Pages 631-641, April 2004. A shorter version appears in the proceedings of ITC 18, Berlin, Sept 2003
*[3.11] C. Touati, E. Altman, and J. Galtier, Semi-Definite Programming for Bandwidth Allocation in Communication Networks , Proceedings of ITC 18, Berlin, Sept 2003.
*[3.12] S. Alouf, E. Altman, C. Barakat, P. Nain, "Estimating membership in a multicast session". Performance Evaluation Review (Proceedings of the conference ACM Sigmetrics 2003, San Diego, Californie), 31(1):250-260, june 2003.
*[3.13] E. Altman, T. Jimenez , R. Nunez Queija and U. Yechiali , Optimal routing among ./M/1 queues with partial information, INRIA Research Report RR-4985. final version in , Stochastic Models, Vol. 20, number 2, pp. 149-172, 2004.
*[3.14] E. Altman, K. Avratchenkov and B. J. Prabhu , "A singular perturbation approach to analysing a RED queue" , HET-NETs'04 International working conference on Performance Modelling and Evaluation of Heterogeneous Networks July, West Yorkshire, U.K., 2004.
*[3.16] R. Groenevelt and E. Altman , Analysis of Alternating-priority Queueing Models with (Cross) Correlated Switchover Times, , IEEE INFOCOM, Miami, March 13-17, 2005.
*[3.17] E. Altman , On stochastic recursive equations and infinite server queues IEEE INFOCOM, Miami, March 13-17, 2005.
*[3.18] E. Altman, J. Galtier and C. Touati, , Utility Based Fair Bandwidth Allocation"Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Networks, Parallel and Distributed Processing and Applications (NPDPA 2002), October 2002, Tsukuba, Japan.
*[3.19] S. Alouf, E. Altman, J. Galtier, J.-F. Lalande, C. Touati, " Quasi-Optimal Resource Allocation in Multi-Spot MFTDMA Satellite Networks". To appear in Combinatorial Optimization in Communication Networks, M. Cheng, Y. Li and D.-Z. Du (éditeurs), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2005.
*[3.20] S. Alouf, E. Altman, C. Barakat, P. Nain, "Optimal estimation of multicast membership". IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Specual Issue of Signal Processing in Networking 51(8):2165-2176, August 2003.
*[3.21] S. Alouf, E. Altman, C. Barakat, P. Nain, "On the dynamic estimation of multicast group sizes". Proceedings of MTNS 2004, Louvain, Belgim, July 2004.
*[3.22] S. Alouf, E. Altman, J. Galtier, J.-F. Lalande, C. Touati, " Quasi-optimal bandwidth allocation for multi-spot MFTDMA satellites". Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2005, Miami, Florida March 2005.

Back to my Web page