[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: multicast-number

To: Patrick Cipiere <Patrick.Cipiere@UDcast.com>
Subject: Re: multicast-number
From: Naomichi Nonaka <nonaka@sdl.hitachi.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 14:30:20 +0900
Cc: udlr@sophia.inria.fr
Organization: Hitachi, Ltd.
References: <200008181634.SAA17297@ra.udcast.com>

Hmm, It's very bad news for us.

Patrick Cipiere wrote:
> 
> So now I am asking the group: do you agree that we have to ask IANA
> for this change?
> How much that will hurt current implementations?
> 

We (Hitachi) already shipped draft-based UDLR receivers and are used
in customers.

Sadly, we defined DTCP address in SOURCE, so firmware upgrade is needed
to change DTCP address.

I can't agree to change DTCP address unless some transition plan is 
admitted.

Naomichi Nonaka

Follow-Ups:
- Re: multicast-number
  - From: Tim Gleeson <tgleeson@cisco.com>

References:
- multicast-number
  - From: Patrick Cipiere <Patrick.Cipiere@UDcast.com>

Prev by Date: Re: IESG review: applicability
Next by Date: Re: multicast-number
Prev by thread: multicast-number
Next by thread: Re: multicast-number
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread