[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: multicast-number

To: Naomichi Nonaka <nonaka@sdl.hitachi.co.jp>, Patrick Cipiere <Patrick.Cipiere@UDcast.com>
Subject: Re: multicast-number
From: Tim Gleeson <tgleeson@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 16:39:14 +0900
Cc: udlr@sophia.inria.fr
In-Reply-To: <39A0BE6B.18621CC1@sdl.hitachi.co.jp>
References: <200008181634.SAA17297@ra.udcast.com>

At 14:30 00/8/21 +0900, Naomichi Nonaka wrote:
> Hmm, It's very bad news for us.
> 
> Patrick Cipiere wrote:
> > 
> > So now I am asking the group: do you agree that we have to ask IANA
> > for this change?

[multicast-addresses] (and RFC2780) says 224.0.0.X is reserved for routing 
protocols etc. It doesn't say these protocols must use 224.0.0.X

Tim

References:
- multicast-number
  - From: Patrick Cipiere <Patrick.Cipiere@UDcast.com>
- Re: multicast-number
  - From: Naomichi Nonaka <nonaka@sdl.hitachi.co.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: multicast-number
Next by Date: MPLS World
Prev by thread: Re: multicast-number
Next by thread: draft-ietf-udlr-lltunnel-04.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread