Re: terminological nit

[Steve Deering <deering@parc.xerox.com>]

Walid,

> The server was cited as an example. It should'nt in any case
> restrict the solution to a client-server model. It was chosen
> as an example to motivate the use of unidirectional "links" to 
> deliver high bandwidth to the "home" clients.

OK.  I don't know what your intentions are for that document, but if you
plan to make it more permanent than an Internet Draft, I suggest that
you make it clearer that you are mentioning a server only as an example.

> It shouldn't have an impact on the symmetry of the solution.

Great, glad you confirmed that.

Steve