|
Publications about urban remote sensing
Result of the query in the list of publications :
Article |
1 - Comparative study on the performance of multi paramater SAR data for operational urban areas extraction. C. Corbane and N. Baghdadi and X. Descombes and M. Petit. IEEE-Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 6(4): pages 728-732, October 2009. Keywords : Markov random field model, synthetic aperture radar, urban remote sensing.
@ARTICLE{COR-09,
|
author |
= |
{Corbane, C. and Baghdadi, N. and Descombes, X. and Petit, M.}, |
title |
= |
{Comparative study on the performance of multi paramater SAR data for operational urban areas extraction}, |
year |
= |
{2009}, |
month |
= |
{October}, |
journal |
= |
{IEEE-Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters}, |
volume |
= |
{6}, |
number |
= |
{4}, |
pages |
= |
{728-732}, |
url |
= |
{http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2009.2024225}, |
keyword |
= |
{Markov random field model, synthetic aperture radar, urban remote sensing} |
} |
Abstract :
The advent of a new generation of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellites, such as Advanced SAR/Environmental Satellite (C-band), Phased Array Type L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar/Advanced Land Observing Satellite (L-band), and TerraSAR-X (X-band), offers advanced potentials for the detection of urban tissue. In this letter, we analyze and compare the performance of multiple types of SAR images in terms of band frequency, polarization, incidence angle, and spatial resolution for the purpose of operational urban areas delineation. As a reference for comparison, we use a proven method for extracting textural features based on a Gaussian Markov Random Field (GMRF) model. The results of urban areas delineation are quantitatively analyzed allowing performing intrasensor and intersensors comparisons. Sensitivity of the GMRF model with respect to texture window size and to spatial resolutions of SAR images is also investigated. Intrasensor comparison shows that polarization and incidence angle play a significant role in the potential of the GMRF model for the extraction of urban areas from SAR images. Intersensors comparison evidences the better performances of X-band images, acquired at 1-m spatial resolution, when resampled to resolutions of 5 and 10 m. |
|
top of the page
These pages were generated by
|