Re: Purpose of terminology I-D

[IZUMIYAMA Hidetaka <izu@jcsat.co.jp>]

From: Walid Dabbous <Walid.Dabbous@sophia.inria.fr>
> we need terminology for :
> 
> 
> 			    
>                               
>                     (1)                           (5)
>                     ---- (2)    (3)           (4) ----
>                     |  |--X---------------->>--X--|  |  
>                     ----                          ----
>                      /\ (8)                        /\ (6)
>                      ||                            ||
>                      \/                            ||  
>                       -----------------------      ||
>                      |                       |<=====
>                      |          (7)          |  
>                      -------------------------
> 

I agree.

> what do you think of:
> 
> (1): Feeder, send-only node, ...
> (2): send-only tap, send-only interface,...
> (3): Unidirectional Link
> (4): Receive only tap or interface
> (5): Receiver, receive-only node (but it's long...)
> (6): receiver bidirectional interface
> (7): bidirectional network, backchannel, ...
> (8): Feeder bidirectional interface.

I agree.

And If someone want to add some term,
I think it is better to regard as synonym.

-- izu --