[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Purpose of terminology I-D

To: Scott Michel <scottm@rush.aero.org>
Subject: Re: Purpose of terminology I-D
From: Steve Deering <deering@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 1997 11:18:04 -0700
Cc: udlr@sophia.inria.fr
In-Reply-To: <199707241810.LAA07148@rush.aero.org>

At 11:09 AM -0700 7/24/97, Scott Michel wrote:
> "Receiver" is really bad. We use the word "receiver" in many contexts.
> I'd like something that is less ambiguous.

How about "feeder" and "feedee"?  :-)

Steve

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Purpose of terminology I-D
  - From: Scott Michel <scottm@rush.aero.org>

References:
- Re: Purpose of terminology I-D
  - From: Scott Michel <scottm@rush.aero.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Purpose of terminology I-D
Next by Date: Re: Purpose of terminology I-D
Prev by thread: Re: Purpose of terminology I-D
Next by thread: Re: Purpose of terminology I-D
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread