[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Tunneling vs routing protocol modification

To: "David M. Meyer" <meyer@network-services.uoregon.edu>
Subject: Re: Tunneling vs routing protocol modification
From: Walid Dabbous <Walid.Dabbous@sophia.inria.fr>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 1997 22:43:43 +0200
cc: udlr@sophia.inria.fr
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 04 Apr 1997 12:33:15 -0800." <199704042033.MAA18093@network-services.uoregon.edu>
Reply-To: dabbous@sophia.inria.fr


>	I don't think RPF assumes link symmetry. It might be 
>	more correct to say that, while RPF works in an 
>	asymmetric unicast routed network, it doesn't necessarily 
>	find shortest paths (unless the network has symmetrical 
>	paths). 

Sure, thanks for the precision in the formulation!



Walid Dabbous
http://www.inria.fr/rodeo/personnel/Walid.Dabbous/me.html
INRIA U.R. de Sophia Antipolis      | Email : dabbous@sophia.inria.fr  
2004, Route des Lucioles BP 93      | Phone : +33 4 93 65 77 18
06902 Sophia Antipolis CEDEX France | Fax   : +33 4 93 65 77 65

References:
- Re: Tunneling vs routing protocol modification
  - From: "David M. Meyer" <meyer@network-services.uoregon.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: dinner on monday?
Next by Date: Re: dinner on monday?
Prev by thread: Re: Tunneling vs routing protocol modification
Next by thread: Re: Tunneling vs routing protocol modification
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread