[std-interval] Comments on the Interval Standard Proposal
Gabriel Dos Reis
gdr at integrable-solutions.net
Sat Sep 30 21:13:26 PDT 2006
Guillaume Melquiond <guillaume.melquiond at ens-lyon.fr> writes:
| > 26.6.1 Header <interval> synopsis
| > Might be better to change the namespace from X_ops to X_comparisons?
| > Such a change is more in line with the actual content.
| The name was inspired by the "rel_ops" STL namespace.
Just a historical note: rel_ops was introduced as a compromise between
removing the operators it contains completely from the standard and
what was originally proposed. Many people view it as a "jail", and
many users don't know about it. I don't know whether that is the case
for the operators you're proposing. This is just a note about how
rel_ops came in, in case you're building on analogy :-)
More information about the Std-interval