[std-interval] FW: applications

Lawrence Crowl lawrence.crowl at gmail.com
Wed Aug 16 16:24:41 PDT 2006


I'm not an expert in the domain, but my read of the conclusions
is that the interval approach wasn't helpful.  Apparently, the
integration process failed far earlier than non-interval integration.
How are we interpreting the conclusions differently?

On 8/15/06, George Corliss <George.Corliss at marquette.edu> wrote:
> Friends,
>
> Ned Neddialkov had sent this pointer which may be of interest to this list
> for use as "ammunition" that intervals are good.
>
> ------ Forwarded Message
> > From: Ned Nedialkov <nedialk at mcmaster.ca>
> > Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:45:01 -0400
> > Subject: applications
> >
> > I discovered recently a very thorough study of applications of
> > interval methods, in particular integration, to space flight mechanics:
> http://www.esa.int/gsp/ACT/doc/ACT-RPT-04-4105-ARIADNA-Assessing_the_Accurac
> y_of_Interval_arithmetic_Estimates.pdf
>
> ------ End of Forwarded Message
>
> The ESA Technical Officer, Mihaly Markot, was a student of Tibor Tsendes.
>
>
> Dr. George Corliss
> Electrical and Computer Engineering
> Marquette University
> P.O. Box 1881
> 1515 W. Wisconsin Ave.
> Milwaukee, WI 53201-1881
> George.Corliss at Marquette.edu
> 414-288-6599 (office); 288-4400 (GasDay);
>     288-6280 (Dept.); 288-5579 (fax)
> Office: Haggerty Engineering 296
> Www.eng.mu.edu/corlissg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Std-interval mailing list
> Std-interval at compgeom.poly.edu
> http://compgeom.poly.edu/mailman/listinfo/std-interval
>


-- 
Lawrence Crowl


More information about the Std-interval mailing list