My master of science deals with the construction of observers for dynamical systems modeling a bioreactor in two dimension when a function of the state variables is bad known that is often the case in biology. A new tool linking classical observer as the high gain and the asymptotic one is built.
First, a one dimensional bounded error observer is built: the error between observer and initial system dis assumed not tend to zero. The main problem of this bounded observer is that we don't have any way to improve the convergence rate. Thus, a two dimensional bounded error observer, using the classical methods of Gauthier Kupka is constructed. The observed error become as small as we want with an adjustable convergence rate at the beginning when the observed error is large and with a fixed convergence rate when this error is less than a fixed constant. A generalization in higher dimension is done for particular dynamical system.
<>Another research interest is cell growth modeling in a chemostat. For particular cells (phytoplankton), oscillatory behavior is observed (Nisbet and Gurney). The main mathematical models in the literature that reproduce this phenomenon are always complex. Indeed, their mathematical analysis is not very simple since their dimension is too high or the mathematical approach (PDE, Pascual and Caswell) does not allow some analytical studies.With our mechanist approach, another growth cell model espacilly for
phytoplankton is built considering stored nutrient in a cell. Indeed,
Droop described a model which take into
account the store average of the cell. This model based on biological
experiences reproduce with accuracy the phytoplankton growth but the
main biological phenomena can not be put into relief. Then, a
biochemically based model is constructed and all the variables have a
biological meaning. The mathematical analysis prove the global
asymptotic stability of the non trivial steady state. A comparison with
the classical model (Droop) is done and we prove that both are
equivalent. Then with different approaches (compartmental and based on
biological data), the same behavior is put into relief. Nevertheless,
our model gives more dynamical informations and justifies a model based
on biological data.